800Notes.com: Phone Call Comments

FTC Bans Prerecorded Sales Calls Without Permission

20 Aug 2008

Yesterday the Federal Trade Commission has issued new rules banning most pre-recorded calls from telemarketers.

It all started in 2004 when the telemarketing industry asked FTC to allow them to play a prerecorded message if a live sales agent was not available. In response FTC proposed a change in the TSR to allow calls that deliver prerecorded messages to consumers with whom a seller had an established business relationship.

The nearly 14,000 comments from the public elicited by that proposal overwhelmingly opposed such a change. Based on that record, in October 2006 the Commission altered its position and instead proposed a broad prohibition on the use of prerecorded messages whenever the consumer called had not previously given express written permission to the seller to place such calls to his or her number. This goes into effect on September 1, 2009.

Also the new rule requires telemarketers with prerecorded calls to give consumers a way to opt out, the same way that they can now ask live sales agents to refrain from calling again. This goes into effect on December 1 2008.

The amendments will not affect consumers' ability to continue to receive calls that deliver purely "informational" prerecorded messages - notifying recipients, for example, that their flight has been cancelled, that they have a service appointment, or similar messages. Such purely "informational" calls are not covered by the TSR because they do not attempt to sell the called party any goods or services.

All charitable solicitation calls placed by for-profit telemarketers that deliver prerecorded messages on behalf of non-profits to members of, or previous donors to, the nonprofit, are exempt from the written agreement requirement but such calls are now required to include a prompt keypress or voice-activated opt-out mechanism.


Offical FTC Rule Amendments

Bookmark this page:

Comments

Rating: +6 Dan - 20 Aug 2008
Does this mean that now the fine print will include "we or our business partners might contact you at the phone number provided with a prerecorded message .... "? I always un-check all opt-in boxes anyway... but I guess the more restrictions the better.
 Reply  
Rating: +5 ThePhoneBear - 2 Sep 2008
I, or We did not purchase our phones to pay for well known practiced unsolicited marketing and promotional calls. Also we are not paying our monthly phone bill to harbor unsolicited calls of any kind.  Therefore how do they get away with perpetual unsolicited callings? Why doesn’t the government wire tap these harassing callers?  Whether they’re marketing and promotions or not, prosecute them to pay one thousand dollars to every phone number that didn’t request their calling.  We’ve got proof of their sometimes threatening promotional tactics playing on fear to coerce their point, and such proof is identified on our phone bill with their number by which we are paying for their air time with the charges billed to us.  This is a “no brainer” for anyone at the FTC to figure out; Ooops, I forgot that the FTC is the government.
 Reply  
Rating: +4 Herb - 9 Sep 2008
Why are you forced to "opt out" and beg these criminals to leave you alone?  That NEVER works because the greedy and selfish people who treat your phone service as their property do not respect your rights!  Nobody wants telemarketing calls, so why not ban them entirely? Those career politicians are all bought and paid for by the Direct Marketing Association, that's why. The DO NOT CALL registry is a total fraud upon the public--just as that is not enforced, this new provision will not be enforced either.  The Republicans & Democrats are constantly mocking your intelligence by inventing new ways to pretend they care about your property rights without actually doing anything to stop the abuse.  If you voted for either of them, you deserve these harassing phone calls.
 Reply  
Rating: +3 wrong guy to call - 20 Aug 2008
It won't work because the FTC & FCC won't enforce it! And if they do, the FTC will lower the fine like they alway do. I think someone at the FTC takes payoffs from the telemarketers. The FTC & the FCC are Bullshitt
 Reply  
Rating: +1 Ralf - 21 Aug 2008
It won't stop the robo-calls from Canda (506 seems to be a very dubious area code) that are coming from actual scammers.  Since they are running illegal outfits trying to get your credit card number, what will they care about an FTC ruling!?!?

Can we get some procecutions, please!!!
 Reply  
Rating: +2 Thomas - 22 Aug 2008
506 calls come from Costa Rica. They have 11 digit numbers and the last digit is not always displayed. I've got multiple calls from these guys and every time they call from a new 506 number.
 Reply  
Rating: +1 Fred Fnord - 21 Aug 2008
They probably aren't coming from Canada.  It's just good sense that if you're going to fake your originating phone number, it's best to fake one that is outside of the jurisdiction of the target.  That way investigations (if any were to occur) get much stickier.

-fred
 Reply  
Rating: +1 Charles - 10 Sep 2008
F anything is a joke. If you don't have a lot of money to give the political parties in bribes (oops contributions) you are on your own. Notice McCain has no need to honor the do not call list he and his cronies passed? I got more harassment from his damned computer generated calls than I got from legitimate sales people. There should be a shock button on all personal phones that sends 1,000,000,000 volts through the originating callers device for these crap calls.
 Reply  
Rating: +7 CarolinTx - 11 Sep 2008
When they passed that law I was angry at their exception for Non=Profits and Political Candidates.  If we dont want calls coming in on our phones from people wanting money WE DONT WANT CALLS FROM NON-PROFITS OR POLITICIANS WANTING MONEY, they are plain and simple the same as telemarketers, PEOPLE WHO WANT MONEY.  If we want to give money to these types of causes we know how to get a hold of THEM.

I seem to be getting unknown callers on my home and cell phone lately who hang up when I dont answer.  I dont give my cell phone number out to ANYONE who isnt a friend.  I pay for a cell phone so I know when it rings its someone I WANT to talk to.  They need to make cell phone numbers ABSOLUTELY, NO EXCEPTION, PRIVATE, non-sellable, givable, tradable, listable.  

Anyone WANTING to be harassed on their cell phone can VOLUNTARILY put their number in a directory.

I would like to know how much some of these 800 numbers payoff the phone company to let their calls go through on a line that is blocked.  I have a Callwave Internet Answering Machine and when I got calls like this I asked them, "whats the deal"?  They said the TP Co. decides who gets through.  WELL I am glad I have the right to elect to have my calls screened but some clown who wants to pester me can pay to override what I am paying for.
 Reply  
Rating: 0 wrongnumber - 10 Oct 2008
They wont change the stupid law because at some point these scum companies pay for a license to harass us plus they pay for the calls ld charges and such. why rock the income? Somebody else said it right "why should we have to opt out for every little thing"? People should have to sign up if they want harassing phone calls.
Does anyone have an idea of how many developmental disabled people get these calls? I took care of a lady that had 100 magazines delivered to her house a month, She entered every contest, gave her soc sec number to anyone that said I prize was on the way and she thought they were really her buddies. I am bothered by the calls but whats most disgusting is the handicapped and elderly that it truly affects. Just a disgrace to mankind!
 Reply  
Rating: 0 Jim - 15 Sep 2008
And the mounties (I've call them directly.) really don't care about Americans.  Candidly, I think we should let the American who threatened a Canadian harasser go.
 Reply  
Rating: +4 stevenw - 21 Aug 2008
I love the exception for for-profit telemarketers representing non-profit charities.   That has been the biggest scam going for years.  The telemarketers keep 85% of the donations and some of these "charities" with the sound-alike names are just scam fronts for the telemarketers.
 Reply  
Rating: +3 myname - 22 Aug 2008
This is good news.  So, where do we go to report them now?  They are calling daily.
 Reply  
Rating: +3 Ken - 26 Aug 2008
It hasn't stopped them -- it's only changed their tactics.  The pre-recorded message now sounds as if it's only "informational", but it's still a sales call.  ("We're calling to let you know about...  Press 1 to talk to an agent.")
 Reply  
Rating: +1 Suzanne - 27 Aug 2008
I get atleast 10 calls per month stating my 'car warranty' has expired. I don't have a car warranty. It is always pre-recorded with no live person to speak with and coming from different phone numbers. I am on National No Call list but still get these. Any comments or ideas what I can do?
 Reply  
Rating: +1 Dave - 27 Aug 2008
I have been getting the same "warranty" calls for months. I tried to report them but the FCC complaint section tells me there is no such number...and of course it changes every time. I am sick of this but can do nothing about it.
 Reply  
Rating: +1 tinkerbell - 30 Aug 2008
I get these stupid calls all the time too. Besides these "car warranty expired" messages I also get a whole bunch of other crap in the past 2 weeks. Its driving me crazy. So glad they didn't call today.
 Reply  
Rating: +2 ischriscrazy - 2 Sep 2008
I get the ones saying my car warranty is about to expire. The irony is my vehicle is a 20 year old van with 347,000 miles on it.
 Reply  
Rating: +1 yahweh - 6 Sep 2008
Suzanne,

sorry, but there's not much you can do.  Anyone can buy the ability to display ANY phone number on the recipient's caller ID, so those numbers and names you are seeing are worthless. Welcome to the age of technology.
 Reply  
Rating: 0 Pete - 27 Aug 2008
I'm from Canada. These new FTC rules mean the calls will be directed here rather than to the U.S. Lately, the number of calls has been increasing with most traced back to the U.S. Nooo I'm not a U.S. hater, in fact I'm married to a U.S. citizen. This is a battle we all have to fight together.

Have you heard about our new DNC list? There are so many exceptions, they might a well not have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars passing it but then they couldn't have those photo ops that try to make it look as if they are doing something. Guess who is at the top of the exceptions list - political parties.

It's funny that web sites like this are even allowed. Lobbyists are working to see that changes.
 Reply  
1 2 3

Post a comment about this news:

 
Your name or nickname as you would like it to appear in the title of your post.
 
  
Validation Code
Type the characters you see in the picture.
Site Menu
Search Phone Number
For example: 777-777-7777
Latest News
Latest Articles
Latest Videos
Link Buttons

Place one of these buttons on your blog and spread the word! The more people participate the stronger our voice is.

Directory of unknown callers

Phone fraud: Report it! Stop it!
Copyright 800notes.com 2008 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service